Knowledge Transfer and

Knowledge Management Systems

 

Collaboration &

Knowledge Management


 

Chair(s):

 

Don Jones (Texas Tech University)

Area of Information Systems and Quantitative Science

Rawls College of Business

Lubbock, TX 79409-2101, USA

Phone: (806) 742-1988, Fax: (806) 742-3193

donald.jones@.ttu.edu

 

Samuel Otim (Clemson University)

Department of Management

101 Sirrine Hall

College of Business and Behavioral Science

Clemson, SC 29634, USA

Phone: (864) 656-3775,  Fax: (864) 656-2015

sotim@clemson.edu

 

Jaeki Song (Texas Tech University)

Area of Information Systems and Quantitative Science

Rawls College of Business

Lubbock, TX 79409-2101, USA

Phone: (806) 742-8036, Fax: (806) 742-3193

jaeki.song@ttu.edu

 

David T. Croasdell (University of Nevada, Reno)

Department of Accounting and Information Systems

314 Ansari MS 026

Reno, NV 89556

Phone: (775)784-6902, Fax: (775)784-8044

davec@unr.edu

Description:

Knowledge management (KM) has become a pervasive imperative for organizations because knowledge is perceived to be a strategic resource necessary for achieving and sustaining competitive advantage. Given the strategic importance of knowledge, organizations are engaged in active management of their knowledge resources, which has spawned significant growth and maturing of the KM field. The formative work in the KM field focused on conceptual issues, such as distinguishing between data, information, and knowledge, as well as the different types of knowledge. The current dominant perspective views KM as a process involving various activities which include the creation, transfer (including storage and retrieval), and application of knowledge. Among other things, an effective KM process requires transfer of knowledge from place of creation to the user. This is because knowledge is of little value if it is not supplied to the right people at the right time. This is often a challenging process that entails getting people to share knowledge; and devising infrastructure, processes, and procedures for creation and transfer of knowledge.

 Information Systems research has played a critical role in identifying technical and organizational factors that support the KM process. Among these factors are 1) design, development and use of information systems to support the creation, storage, transfer, sharing, integration, and utilization of knowledge assets, 2) structured methods for managing knowledge, and 3) social and behavioral implications of implementing knowledge management processes and knowledge management systems (KMS). Despite strident efforts made, KM continues to present researchers with a variety of complex issues that warrant research attention.

The mini-track will focus on:

  • Knowledge transfer and organizational learning/organizational memory

·        The social and behavioral issues related to the use of KMS for knowledge creation and knowledge sharing

·        Knowledge exchange within and across organizations (e.g., management practices for the transfer of tacit knowledge; processes and mechanisms to aid the transfer of knowledge across domains, functions, departments, and business units within the organization; the role of strategic alliances, learning networks, and communities of practice in inter-organizational knowledge sharing and transfer)

·        Barriers to knowledge transfer within and across organizations

·        Facilitators of and barriers to KMS adoption and use

·        The implications of KMS design for inter and intra-organizational relationships

·        The role of electronic communities of practice on the creation and maintenance of knowledge networks

·        Web-based KMS and social opinion development and diffusion

·        Alignment of KMS characteristics with KM objectives and processes

·        Theoretical aspects of the social implications of KMS development, adoption, and use

·        Conceptual and theoretical perspectives on knowledge transfer/sharing

·        Property rights/intellectual property issues in the management of knowledge assets

·        Assessing and benchmarking the maturity of KM processes and KMS

·        Measuring return on investment in knowledge assets and KMS

·        Assessment of the impact of KM processes and KMS use on organizational performance (e.g., lessons learned from successful and failed attempts to develop, adopt and use KMS)

 

 AMCIS 2007 Colorado        http://www.biz.colostate.edu/amcis07/       Key Dates:

Paper Abstracts Due (optional) Monday, February 5, 2007
Papers Due:   Monday, March 5, 2007
Notification of Acceptance:   Monday, April 16, 2007
Camera Ready Copy Due:   Monday, April 30, 2007