 |
Ken Manning - Abstract |
| |
|
|
|
Although numerous inquiries concerning
comparative advertising appear in the literature, little
research has examined indirect comparative claims touting a
brand's superiority over all competitors. While the available
evidence offers advertisers little reason to use such claims,
our research conveys a different story about its effectiveness.
Study 1 shows indirect comparative advertising claiming
superiority over all competitors to be more effective than
direct comparative and noncomparative advertising in positioning
a brand against the entire market along featured attributes.
Study 2 demonstrates that indirect comparative advertising's
inferiority in positioning a brand against a specific competitor
versus all competitors disappears when consumers spontaneously
generate this competitor during ad processing.
Return to Dr. Manning's Home Page |
|
|
|